Comments for IF YOU CAN THINK

Comment on Khalq-e-Khuda Ki Ghaat Mein by Khurram

Khurram — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:22:24 +0000

yes I agree with kunwar Mudassir if you will post in urdu then people more understand.

Comment on Khalq-e-Khuda Ki Ghaat Mein by Kunwar Mudassir Shahzad

Kunwar Mudassir Shahzad — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:49:29 +0000

ASSALAM-O-ALAIKUM

Hats off Imran Bhai. The people who cant understand the DEPTH in IQBAL’s poetry, can easily get the GREAT MESSAGE. It would be great if you post things in URDU too.

Comment on Iblees ki Majlis-e-Shura (The Devil’s Advisory Council) by Bilal Hashim

Bilal Hashim — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:08:58 +0000

Jazak Allah nojawan

Comment on Remembering Islam and Shariah by Asim Ali

Asim Ali — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:49:29 +0000

Same things come into my mind also and I do not have any conflicting argument against your statements. Because I cannot walk along the path given from my ancestors, same time concentrate on my own self and think. The statements from the two conflict, things being imposed from the outside do not match what I find inside me. In other words do not satisfy me. Although I do not have very good knowledge about the case as compare to the other people but the analysis shows me the different aspects and directions. But I want to ask questions to whom have done well research on the case and have vast knowledge spectrum like well known Islamic scholars. Didn’t these things come into their minds? Why haven’t they analyzed the the things in the different directions? Why majority of scholars always try to see the things in the same spectrum and try to make constitutions from the past same source? Why do not they see the history like I see? I do not say that I should follow the same path, keep moving with things blindly, quiet without analysis, but i need more knowledge about the case about history, hadith and other related subjects.

Comment on Hazrat Ali, Tirmidhi (ترمذی) and Our Scholars by !mran

!mran — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:10:03 +0000

Dear Mr. Farrukh,

I mostly do not approve such illogical comments on my blog because if you had read my post and my responses to Mr. Faraz, you would have never considered me spreading Fitna-e-Inkaar-e-Hadith. I will soon be writing a post specially on this topic because this has been a tradition in our society that whoever speaks against anything, which according to their LORDs is correct, they entitle the person as “Munkir-e-Hadith”. However their LORDs themselves refuse sayings of prophet whenever they like.

The same scholar who believed in this narration and referred it during his explanation of Qur’an refuses clearly the other narrations from bukhari. Should I give you proofs? Will you then call him “Munkir-e-Hadith”? You will not because he has some other “SUGER COATED WAYS” to refuse them.

Let me summarize here again.

1. For me, Mohammad P.B.U.H is the best example and no-man’s words are precious than his.

2. I know GOD (Allah) today and Qur’an because they were introduced to the nation by Mohammad P.B.U.H. How can I or anyone else refuse his sayings while all 114 chapters and 6666 verses of Qur’an were given to the humanity by him?

3. First of all, specifically, this narration is NOT a hadith or saying of prophet. This is a HISTORICAL event which was recorded after 200 years of its happening, approximately.

4. Either everyone is “Munkir-e-Hadith” OR no one is. Think about it!!

5. No one challenges the “Authority”, everyone challenges the “Authenticity” of sayings of prophet and historical events. The commands and words of Mohammad P.B.U.H were and are the authority but don’t we need to check their authenticity?

6. Some people divide the ahadith in different categories and then refuse the “Authenticity”, some people compare saying(s) of prophet with other sayings and with the whole teaching of Qur’an and then refuse the “Authenticity”. Do I need to explain the difference between “Authority” and “Authenticity” of any thing.

My brother! I can’t make everyone understand in this world. People are master in propagandas. I care about only those people who want to understand.

Regards,

Comment on Hazrat Ali, Tirmidhi (ترمذی) and Our Scholars by Furrukh sultan

Furrukh sultan — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:51:43 +0000

I read article and comments on this topic, i respect imran’z bhai knowledge. but i think he spread fitna inkar-e-hadith in sugar coated way, and also he can’t clarify valid questions which arose fraz, so i request to imran think again seriously on these questions because
“You Can Think”…..

Comment on Remembering Islam and Shariah by !mran

!mran — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:52:23 +0000

Updated – More Detailed Now

Comment on Iblees ki Majlis-e-Shura (The Devil’s Advisory Council) by Asim Ali

Asim Ali — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:16:14 +0000

Dear Imran Bhai,

Good Work!!!
Keep it up………..!

IN GHULAMON KA YE MASLAK HE K NAAQIS HE KITAAB
K SIKHAATI NAHI MOMIN KO GHULAAMI KE TAREEQ

Comment on Iblees ki Majlis-e-Shura (The Devil’s Advisory Council) by Rafath

Rafath — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:56:43 +0000

Imran,
fantastic job buddy…

Comment on Sectarianism (Firqa-Bandi) by Hina

Hina — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:14:33 +0000

MashaAllah your work is really very good.I have read two of your posts and found them remarkable, its worth sharing.JazakAllah